Filed under: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin | Tags: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin
I think this is idiotic father should have his sanity called into question. This is right up there with tattooing a profanity on this young girl’s forehead. This act as a “sign of support for the McCain campaign” is beyond moronic.
I just hope that as the girl grows up and realized how awkward the name is, that she is allowed to rip off his eyebrows with Duct Tape on her birthday.
Filed under: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin | Tags: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity
Now I could really go off on Sean Hannity and his inability to even remotely pretend that he was a real journalist, but I think this extremely pathetic attempt at an interview speaks volumes for FoxNews and demographic McCain/Palin want to reach.
My first reaction was at amazing revalation, that many of us suspected, in which John McCain admits in so many words that he and Sarah Palin aren’t very good at communicating. When asked if they critique each other, he says no. His strategy is “two words–have fun.” To that I say, I hope they are having their fun now, because while they polish their one liners and time those winks for more effective wpm (winks per minute) the American people are cringing in fear for their futures. Strapped citizens are trying to kill themselves because they aren’t finding an answer from their representatives, and McCain/Palin just want to have fun.
The next point was even more amazing to me. John McCain brings up a point that many special needs children, many of who are autistic, come to the debates and speeches. McCain wants to give Sarah Palin the task of “finding the cause and cure” for autism, to which he states she is “uniquely qualified.” Excuse me!?! How is Sarah Palin qualified to find the cure for autism? Is her expertise in neurological science now? I thought it was energy? I guess if you think you can tackle all the worlds problems at once, why can’t your VP with a journalism degree be one of the experts in finding a cure for autism? There has been much research to suggest a connection between stem cell mutation and autism, so since Sarah Palin objects to stem cell research, does that mean we are back to looking for a cure that she approves of?
Next point energy. To explain their past differences, Palin states that we need an “all of the above” solution to our energy future. The funny thing is that Palin and the GOP have often resisted the need for alternative fuels. What I love is how they can easily cherry pick international examples for societies that have made great strives in energy efficiency. But didn’t their answer still seem rather vague and more about “drilling” for buzz words and not providing a strategy.
Ugh. Moose hunting is fun.
Part 2, nothing new here. McCain continues making the same slips on Obama and foreign policy. Remember Kosovo? McCain criticized the air raids ordered by the Bush regime for bombing from high altitudes and hitting non-combat targets. Palin then adds that Obama has a “gross misunderstanding” of Afghanistan. I have the feeling Palin still doesn’t know they aren’t our neighbors. McCain then twists his no vote against funding to be against withdrawal and not against the troops, but that logic is flawed. A vote against is a vote against. I don’t want to talk about their broken record of economic policies and their critique of Obama. Palin goes off on not understanding where Obama plans to get the money for his new spending plans. I hate to tell them but you can find it on the “Internets.” McCain then lies again about Obama’s record.
Part 3, almost Ayers.
Once again the lap dog asks the attack dog what more they need to know about the Ayers/Obama relationship. The truth is that their relationship is no more influential than many of the more atrocious relationships of McCain and Palin. If this is about judgment and being candid, aren’t the GOP guilty of their own sins?
Palin needed to look McCain in the eye, but since he hasn’t been in Alaska in years, how did she do that in accepting his choice for VP? More stories from the north. I wonder what letters she saw in his eyes? FTL?
Hannity spews some poll numbers that are horribly underrepresented. By Hannity’s count they are only down by 2 or 3 points. The fact is that they were down by nearly double digits in most of the polls. I guess math isn’t their strong suit either. Of course Hannity has an honorary degree given to him by Jerry Fallwell, seeing as how Hannity has always been described as an “indifferent student.” Learning makes my brain parts hurt!
All I can say that for Hannity to stage this “infomercial” for the McCain campaign is a show of a lack of professionalism and just how inauthentic Hannity truly is. There were no real questions asked. Hannity set the questions up on a silver platter for McCain/Palin to hit out of the park like a coach prepping the Tee-ball team. Granted most of the people who watch this “show” are already sold on the GOP and will buy any line that comes out of the conservative right’s mouth. If you haven’t seen Hannity get his lies thrown back at him, You Tube it. How many days left until Nov. 4?
Filed under: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin | Tags: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin
In the 2nd presidential debate John McCain chided Obama for supporting earmarks in support of a “overhead projector” for a planetarium in Chicago. Well upon looking into this matter, we can easily see that the “overhead projector” is actually a quite complex projection system for displaying star systems and planets during educational presentations.
I suppose understanding space is worthless to a campaign constantly looking down at everyone.
Sarah are you afraid of what you might see if you look into space and don’t see Jesus smiling back? Then again McCain was for the dissolution of the Department of Education. Let’s face it, educational underachievers can’t see the value of learning, no matter how many things they read.
The thing that makes me laugh the most is that this point is first on a list of earmarks reported by Obama. I guess picking the first one and sticking to it is enough work for the campaign strategists? I thought we were after making this earmark process transparent and stop those behind closed doors deals that are icky. So is publishing your proposals on the web hiding something? I guess if you only use the internet to watch FoxNews you probably didn’t use the “Googles” in the right way.
(Update) It seems MSNBC and countless science lovers noticed this was a failed argument.
Filed under: Election 2008, Sarah Palin | Tags: Election 2008, Sarah Palin, sickening
When asked what newspaper sources or magazines she had read to stay informed, Sarah Palin gave what could be the most elusive and vague answer I have seen in recent memory.
Couric: “What newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this, to stay informed? To understand the world…”
Palin: “I’ve read most of them, again, with a great appreciation for the press and the media coming..
Couric: “Like what ones specifically?”
Palin: “All of them, any of them that have been in front of me all these years. I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news… Alaska isn’t a foreign country; where it’s kind of suggested that–wow–how could you keep in touch with the rest of Washington DC may be thinking and doing when you live up there in Alaska. Alaska is a microcosm of America.”
After I picked up the brain matter that had tried to run away from this vacuous rambling, I reflected on what I just heard.
- Not being able to cite one source for your knowledge shows a lack of intelligence. I wonder if you just flipped through the paper to get to the comics and still can claim that as scanning the “Times?” It’s almost like watching comedy with the sound off, you probably missed something important.
- No one is suggesting that Alaskans can’t or don’t read the same news as everyone else, they are suggesting that you don’t read the same news that an elected official NEEDS to stay abreast of current events.
- Once again bringing up your self-imposed “alien nation” status of Alaska being like a “foreign country” to many Americans doesn’t relate to this question. In fact I can name several internationally created journals and newspapers that I read regularly to keep up with many views on the same subject. So does that mean I am being unAmerican or more inquisitive? I am feeling that I could debate Palin and come out looking like a seasoned Washington pro…
- Word of advice-when asked for specifics you can never answer in the same phrase or argument, “All of them and any of them.” This is a logical fallacy and, for lack of a better term, quite idiotic. If you can’t name one, just say it and appear like the Jane-Six-Pack you want to be. Those damn intellectuals with their books and reading and thinking. Jesus didn’t read, he fished.
Would someone in the McCain campaign stop her already. America might see this as the most intelligent executive decision you could make. Any boss that hired a worker to only find that instead of processing data they spend most days tasting the White Out, would probably find removing that employee a positive move.
Anyone else notice how uncomfortable Katie Couric looked during that answer? I could feel her brain going, “Say something. Please don’t nod and let her get away with this. Oh you’re nodding. Chalk one more up to cowardice. I wonder where Matt Lauer is now?”
I wonder how close this might be to what we hear on Thursday.
Remember to phrase your answers in the form of a question.
Filed under: Election 2008, Joe Biden, Sarah Palin | Tags: Election 2008, Joe Biden, Sarah Palin
Do we honestly believe that Sarah Palin knew anything about Joe Biden before a few months ago? I can almost be certain that Biden’s speeches weren’t at the top of the curriculum in her Alaskan grade school. So why make that joke to point out Biden’s age and experience, when your campaign associate is easily old enough to be your father and nearly grandfather?
For someone demanding respect and equal footing, the least experienced of the four regarding Washington politics, probably shouldn’t belittle the lengthy track record of her opponent.
But let’s do the math:
- Palin born 1964.
- 2nd grade attendance – 1971 or 1972?
- Joe Biden become Senator in 1973.
So did Palin fail the 1st or 2nd grade?
I know this is a silly topic, but the real point is that she thinks her short span of political experience equals his service to the nation.
Then the college football comment, ugh, what are we in high school? That is the equivalent of when a pro wrestler or rock star asks the crowd something and then mentions their name. (Instant cheering.)
BTW- did you know that the word “doggone” is an alteration of a Scottish word that basically means “goddamn.” Man what a potty mouth.
Filed under: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin | Tags: Election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin, sickening
If you missed the original issue, look on YouTube for Palin and Cheesesteak. The real issue for me isn’t that her statement contradicts the McCain viewpoint on how to deal with terrorists, but rather that they have walked down another pathway to dementia.
Instead of admitting that Palin was being too general in her “strategy” the McCain campaign adds another “name” to the list of enemies on their political paranoia parchment. (ooo I love alliteration.) If it isn’t the liberal devils surfing the “Googles” then it’s those harsh media critics that stray from the preordained set of easy pitch questions packaged by the campaign.
To watch these two in action defending themselves against the journalistic skills of Katie Couric should send shivers down the spine of all Americans. If Palin can’t keep up with Couric, imagine what President Zidari must have thought. Kissinger probably wanted to bludgeon himself with a candelabra during their time at the UN. Come on, Kissinger has worked alongside some of the most influential world figures in our history. Mao Zhedong. Leonid Brezhnev. Now he can add Palin to that list.
Of course maybe McCain forgot what Kissinger once said about military men, you know, those “‘dumb, stupid animals to be used’ as pawns for foreign policy.”
So is it “gotcha” journalism that makes what she said less relevant or do we want to revisit the “gotcha” moment that made Obama less favorable with those bitter, gun toting Pennsylvanians? Probably not, because that was groundbreaking journalism or was it the same?
The amazing bravado of McCain and Palin to pretend to be on the same level as Ronald Reagan or Bill Clinton, is sickening. I find it hard to take people seriously if they display such polar attitudes in such short spans of time. Watching Palin chuckle about the new term she adopted, “gotcha journalism”, and then put on her serious face to continue to show her disdain is mind-boggling.
On a side note, I am very tired of hearing this new “tactic” by McCain to criticize those who make statements about what should be done to fight and find the terrorists we face as enemies. His repeated line of, “you don’t announce that you are going to attack” seems to be right in line with the Bush doctrine doesn’t it? He doesn’t deny that he may attack Pakistan, he just wants to make sure it’s a surprise. I wonder what other terrorist harboring, freedom wanting, non-Democratic countries the McCain/Palin empire wants to liberate from the chains of oppression.
Oh, sorry. I shouldn’t have revealed that premade policy, kinda like that debate victory ad…